Lushhomemedia

Archive for December 22nd, 2008

Ascott to manage Citadines residences in Jakarta

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

CapitaLand’s wholly-owned serviced residence arm The Ascott Group (Ascott) has clinched a contract to manage its first Citadines-branded serviced residence in Indonesia.

Jakarta is the 14th city in Asia Pacific to have a Citadines property as part of Ascott’s plans to continue to expand its Citadines brand in the region.

The 120-unit Citadines Jakarta is located in the Central Business District of Menteng and is scheduled to open by second-half 2010.

There are plans to add another 100 units to Citadines Jakarta in the future.

Gerald Lee, CEO of Ascott Hospitality, the hospitality management arm of The Ascott Group, said in a news release issued on Monday: ‘Our Ascott and Somerset branded properties are performing favourably in Indonesia with year-to-date average occupancy of about 80 per cent. The introduction of the Citadines brand will enable us to capture a broader customer segment of business travellers. Citadines Jakarta offers good value, great location and flexible services.’

‘The property is in a vibrant and trendy area, and will be popular with the young independent travellers because of the easy access to various exciting amenities.’

Source : Business Times – 22 Dec 2008

Posted in General, Overseas Property, Service Apartment | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ascott expands its Citadines brand to Jakarta

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

Serviced apartment operator Ascott Group, a wholly owned subsidiary of CapitaLand, has secured a contract to manage its first Citadines serviced residences in Jakarta.

Citadines Jakarta, located in the central business district of Menteng, will have 120 residence units and is scheduled to open in the second half of 2010.

The group said there are plans to add another 100 units in the future.

Citadines is one of the group’s three brands, along with Ascott and Somerset.

The group said the introduction of Citadines will enable it to capture a broader customer segment of business travellers.

The Ascott Group is the largest international serviced residence owner-operator globally, with around 18,000 operating residence units in Asia Pacific, Europe and the Gulf region.

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 22 Dec 2008

Posted in General, Overseas Property, Service Apartment | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Builders must be licensed to carry out building works by June 2009

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

All builders in Singapore must apply for builder’s licence by June 16 next year to carry out building works here. This requirement under the Building Control Act came into effect on December 16.

The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) is giving builders a grace period of six months to submit their requests to facilitate the application process for two types of licences.

General Builder licences are for those who undertake general building works where plans are required to be approved by the Commissioner of Building Control.

Depending on conditions such as the scope and value of building works to be carried out, builders can be issued with either Class 1 or Class 2 general licences.

The other type of licence is the Specialist Builder licence which is meant for those who work in specialist areas that have a high impact on public safety and require specific expertise.

Under the new licensing scheme, every builder must appoint two key personnel – the Approved Person, who will direct the management of the business in Singapore, and a Technical Controller who will personally supervise the execution and performance of building works.

BCA said the new licensing regime aims to raise professionalism among builders by requiring them to meet minimum standards of management, safety record and financial solvency.

More information is available online at www.bca.gov.sg.

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 22 Dec 2008

Posted in Construction, General | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

S’pore builders must be licensed to work by June ‘09

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

All builders in Singapore carrying out building works under the Building Control Act will have to apply for their builder’s licence latest by June 16 next year.

This requirement first came into effect on Dec 16 2008. Builders are given a grace period of six months (till June 16 2009) to apply for a licence so as to facilitate a smoother and gradual application process.

‘The aim of licensing of builders is to raise professionalism among builders by requiring them to meet minimum standards of management, safety record and financial solvency,’ the Building and Construction Authority said in a statement on Monday.

There will be two types of licences: the General Builder licence for builders undertaking general building works where plans are required to be approved by the Commissioner of Building Control, and the Specialist Builder licence for builders who work in specialist areas which have a high impact on public safety and require specific expertise.

The General Builder licence has two classes: Class 1 licence allows the holder to carry on the business of a general builder for any project, while Class 2 licence restricts the holder to projects not more than $6 million in value.

Sole proprietorships, partnerships and limited liability partnerships will only be eligible to apply for Class 2 licence.

In addition, all Class 1 General Builders undertaking a project of value which is $20 million (US$14 million) or more will need to deploy a prescribed minimum number of construction personnel who are registered under the Construction Registration of Tradesmen Scheme.

Source : Business Times – 22 Dec 2008

Posted in Construction, General | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Firms shelve supply of 1,000 new apartments

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

Project development deferred; en bloc properties return to rental market

At least 1,000 projected new apartment units can be expected to be withdrawn from immediate supply in Singapore’s property market, as properties that were sold en bloc in recent years are put back on the market for rental.

The latest of these is Lucky Tower at Grange Road which was bought by City Developments Ltd (CDL) in May 2006.

A CDL spokesman said that the entire development of 91 units has been leased to a master tenant that intends to sub-let the units.

According to data complied by Savills Singapore, Lucky Tower was expected to be redeveloped into a 178-unit condominium. However, with redevelopment pushed back, these units are not expected to come on to the market anytime soon.

Another development, the 192-unit The Grangeford at Leonie Hill, acquired by OUE in 2007, has also been put back on the rental market.

OUE is controlled by the Lippo Group and Malaysian tycoon Ananda Krishnan. Lippo Realty executive director Thio Gim Hock said that approximately 70 per cent of the units have already been leased, mainly to expatriates.

On why it decided to defer redevelopment, Mr Thio said: ‘The market does not look good for this year or the next.’

It is understood that asking rents for The Grangeford start at about $3,500 for 1,110 square foot two-bedroom units and about $4,500 for a 1,700 sq ft three-bedroom unit.

The Pontiac Land Group has also started to lease out Pin Tjoe Court, which it acquired in September 2006. Senior vice-president (residential leasing) William Teh said that it expects to redevelop the site next year. ‘Till then, we are offering very short-term leases, and this is not representative of typical rental in the market,’ he added.

Frasers Centrepoint said that Flamingo Valley, which it acquired in early 2007, has been put on the rental market with close to 60 per cent of the 185 units leased out.

Other en bloc developments back on the rental market include Furama Towers, Fairways Condominium, Sophia Court, and Lincoln Lodge.

The increasing number of en bloc sites put back on the rental market is expected to further depress already weakening rentals.

Referring to this ‘hidden leasing supply’, Japanese investment house Nomura said: ‘The move by developers to return en bloc units back to the leasing market to cover to a degree of the holding costs is not unanticipated.’

In the case of Grangeford, assuming a gross rent of $3.40 psf for the 396,483 sq ft apartment block, Nomura estimates that it could secure net income of $14.6 million, equating to a 2.3 per cent yield over its $625 million acquisition price, ‘providing some relief to covering the site’s holding costs’.

Regardless of ‘hidden leasing supply’, rentals are already expected to fall. Still, Knight Frank director (research and consultancy) Nicholas Mak believes that the ‘hidden supply’ of leasing units will not make much of a dent on the rental market. For starters, he notes, many of these en bloc developments have already reached a state of disrepair.

Pointing out that the 108-unit Fairways is about 10 per cent leased, he says that many of the units have been ’stripped bare’.

He also noted that these units have short leases and tenants may be given only one-month’s notice to vacate.

Another consequence of deferred en bloc redevelopment is the impact this has on future supply.

Savills Singapore estimates that based on the en bloc deals between 2005 and 2007, over 23,000 new units could be added to the market.

But, as Nomura notes, supply has been increasingly pushed to 2012. As at the third quarter of this year, it found that some 16,762 units are scheduled for completion in 2012, versus the previous quarter’s estimate of 14,179 units.

Based on an analysis of official data since Q499, it also found that actual completions lagged behind forecast completions.

The Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) has also clarified that while developments are deemed ‘under construction’ in its database, this does not necessarily mean construction has begun.

A spokesman for URA said that it considers a project to be ‘under construction’ once the Building and Construction Authority records indicate that a project has been issued a permit to commence structural works.

As at Q308, there are 10,007 units under construction. URA said: ‘As developers do not have to inform the government of actual ground-breaking after obtaining the permit to commence structural works, URA does not have information on the number of units, expected to be completed in 2009, which have actually broken ground.’

However, it added that it understands that actual construction for a project typically begins within 1-3 months after the developer obtains the permit to commence structural works for the project.

The number of developments that could be deferred will remain unknown. CB Richard Ellis executive director Jeremy Lake pointed out: ‘Even if the property has been demolished, a meaningful number of projects will be delayed as construction costs are expected to fall over the next 18 months.’

Source : Business Times – 22 Dec 2008

Posted in General | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Int’l schools’ student numbers holding up

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

But they expect fewer students next year as expats lose jobs, return home

IF expatriates are leaving Singapore, they appear to be leaving their kids behind – at least, for now.

While expats are losing their jobs and being sent home amid leaner economic times – quite a few, at least, have been fired in the financial industry – international schools here appear to be unaffected.

Virtually all five schools that BT checked with recently reported no unusual change in their student population – or even coming enrolments.

‘There were some departures, there were also some arrivals (recently),’ said Singapore American School communications director Beth Gribbon. ‘But the numbers were the same as they were at the same time last year.’

She said that, so far, the fallout of the global financial crunch has no impact on the school, which has 3,800 students.

‘Our number of students is not dramatically different from before,’ she said.

The same goes for the Australian International School, Swiss School and the ISS International School Singapore.

‘Our repatriation rate has been around 10 per cent annually and so far, the numbers seem to indicate so,’ said Angelia Toh, director for admissions and marketing at ISS.

Only EtonHouse International, popular for pre-school classes, indicated that it lost some Korean students because of the shaky economic situation back in South Korea.

‘These students were in Singapore with their mothers, while their fathers remained in Korea to support their children’s education,’ said Ng Gim Choo, managing director of EtonHouse. ‘The reason cited for the family returning home was the uncertainty in the economic climate in Korea.’

While international schools seem largely unaffected by the current economic conditions, moving firms dealing with expats here reportedly are seeing an increase in demand for their services.

Several saw their businesses getting a boost in recent months. Geometra Worldwide Movers told The Sunday Times that they now anticipate at least 15 expats relocating monthly, up from two to three before September when the global financial crisis was sparked off.

Most of its clients are families heading back to the United States, while others are returning to Europe and Australia.

The number of expats moving back home is likely to rise next year – and this may finally have an impact on international schools.

‘The entire global economy has been affected by the economic downturn,’ Mrs Ng said. ‘Naturally, there is every likelihood that there will be some impact in the education sector as well. We anticipate the effects to be felt next year, though we do not anticipate a significant downturn.’

Expecting ‘a few more withdrawals’ from its school next year, EtonHouse plans to concentrate on consolidation rather expansion in 2009.

Added Ms Toh: ‘At the present moment, things seem to be in status quo with just a handful of our students repatriating. But we anticipate the effect will be more prominent next year.’

Even the Australian International School, which is pushing ahead with its expansion to build a new senior campus, conceded that its student numbers will be hit if the financial situation worsens.

Kim Douglas, the school’s director for marketing and enrolments, said that the Australian International School currently has 2,145 students, with another 320 joining in January. ‘There are around 180 leavers, which is normal for this time of the year,’ she said.

But for the Swiss School, things are still looking up. The number of students registered there for January 2009 ‘is still on the rise’, according to Callie Wong, the school’s administration manager.

Source : Business Times – 22 Dec 2008

Posted in Foreigners, General | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Credit screening is done

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

Loan givers have checks done on buyer’s profile

In “Risk profiling for homebuyers?”(Dec 17), Mr Ee Teck Siew suggested that the Government and industry associations consider implementing a “fact finding process” to ensure that potential home buyers buy properties they can afford, based on their abilities to service mortgage loans.

Most homebuyers would need to obtain a bank loan upfront. The homebuyers would therefore be subject to creditscreening by the banks, which will ensure that the home-buyers can afford the properties they intend to buy. In the credit checks, the banks would typically take into consideration the homebuyer’s income, age and other debt commitments.

Housing and Development Board (HDB) flat buyers taking HDB concessionary loans are required to obtain a HDB Loan Eligibility (HLE) letter before committing to the flat purchase. The HLE letter similarly takes into account the flat buyers’ age, income and other financial commitments to calculate the maximum loan quantum and the expected monthly installments to ensure that the flat buyer is not financially overstretched.

We thank Mr Ee for his feedback.

Lim Yuin Chien
Deputy Director (Corporate Communications), Ministry of National Development

Source : Today – 22 Dec 2008

Posted in General, HDB News | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

S’pore investors in UK land buying scheme may LOSE ALL

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

Housewife with cancer and brain tumour wants her money back after firm shuts down

SHE said she was promised returns of more than 500 per cent if she invested $31,000 in a plot of land in the UK.

Thinking she had a chance to make some money, the Singapore woman put down a deposit and signed a contract.

The woman, who is a cancer patient, said she had hoped to repay her husband’s kindness and pay him back the savings he had poured into her treatment.

But the $3,100 deposit she put down has now allegedly disappeared, along with the real estate company UK Prime Land that once operated from an office in Parkway Parade.

The couple are also stuck with $2,000 in legal costs they incurred while trying to pull out of the deal.

It is not known how many other investors also put money into the scheme. What is clear is that many are likely to suffer a total loss.

A companies search revealed that UK Prime Land’s sole shareholder is a Vietnamese national with no Singapore address listed.

Its registered office at Albert Street is nothing but a service that offers premises and secretarial support for hire.

Police reports

When contacted by The New Paper on Sunday, police spokesman Stanley Norbert said police have received reports against the company and are looking into the matter.

The couple requested not to be named, as most of their family members do not know about the case.

But they hope their story will alert other Singaporeans.

Said Mrs Tham (not her real name), 34, a housewife: ‘I don’t know why I believed them. I’ve never gone for such things before.

‘That day, I thought if I really get $200,000, I can do a lot of things… considering, you know, my condition, my sickness.’

Mrs Tham is suffering from stage four breast cancer, a brain tumour and epilepsy.

She had hoped to gain back more than $200,000 in one year, as promised by the company.

Mrs Tham had to quit her sales job last year when her cancer got worse.

The couple now depend on her husband’s $3,000 monthly salary.

She said: ‘Almost every month, I have to take medicine and see doctors. If I have my own money, I can pay my husband back.’

Mrs Tham said she received a call in October from UK Prime Land saying she had won a 40 sq m plot of land in Dundee, UK, as part of a lucky draw, and that she had to go to its office to claim the prize.

She said: ‘I didn’t take part in any lucky draw, so I was suspicious. But she said it’s free, just go down and get the (land title deed), no need to pay anything.’

So she went to the company’s office at Parkway Parade a week later.

It was a professional-looking outfit, with wooden floors, the company’s logo stamped on all their stationery, and more than 10 staff in office wear.

Mrs Tham said she was ushered into a room, where a man congratulated her and showed her photos of the plot of land she had ‘won’.

He then allegedly started to persuade her to invest $31,000 in a second plot of UK land.

Mrs Tham claimed that when she said she wasn’t interested, he kept repeating his sales pitch, and got a female supervisor to join in.

Said Mrs Tham: ‘The lady kept saying, if you invest just $31,000, after one year, you can get back more than $200,000.’

Mrs Tham claimed she was shown several contracts signed by others and was told that the available land was going fast.

She was also allegedly told she could just put down a 10 per cent deposit of $3,100, and if her relatives didn’t approve of the investment, she would get a refund.

Mrs Tham claimed she was subjected to the high-pressure sales tactics for about two hours. Worn down, she finally agreed to pay the deposit and sign the contract.

It included the line that the deposit is ‘refundable in case of hers disapproval of next of kin’ (sic).

Mrs Tham admitted she didn’t read the contract before signing.

She said: ‘The words are so small, so many, who has the patience to read everything.’

When she got home and showed the contract to her husband, he felt something was wrong.

Said Mr Tham, 35, a service engineer: ‘The sum and the investment period are all not there in the contract.’

There was no mention of the $200,000 returns, or even a guarantee on the $31,000 principal.

He got Mrs Tham to seek a refund of the deposit from UK Prime Land office the next day but the company allegedly refused.

Worried that his wife may be liable to pay the rest of the $31,000, Mr Tham sought a lawyer’s help to ask for a refund, and to declare the contract null and void.

Again, the company allegedly refused, so the couple filed a suit against them.

The company did not turn up in court on the hearing date, and Mr and Mrs Tham got a judgement against them in their absence for the $3,100, plus costs.

When the company still did not pay, Mr Tham went to its Parkway Parade office early this month. That’s when he realised the office was empty.

Nearby tenants told The New Paper on Sunday that the office has been closed for about a month.

All calls to the land lines went unanswered, and a handphone number given to Mrs Tham is no longer in service.

The serviced office operator at Albert Street claimed he knows nothing about the daily workings of the company.

He said his main role was to help do the paperwork when the company was set up in the middle of last year.

He claimed he did not know anything was amiss until last month, when the police came to the door asking him questions.

He said he has also since filed a police report against UK Prime Land.

Source : New Paper – 21 Dec 2008

Posted in General, Landbanking | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

US housing bubble stoked by ‘97 tax cut

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 22, 2008

Ryan Wampler had never made much money selling his own homes.

Starting in 1999, however, he began to do very well. Three times in eight years, Mr Wampler – himself a home builder and developer – sold his home in the Phoenix area, always for a nice profit. With prices in Phoenix soaring, he made almost US$700,000 on the three sales.

And thanks to a tax break proposed by then-President Bill Clinton and approved by Congress in 1997, he did not have to pay tax on most of that profit. It was a break that had not been available to generations of Americans before him. The benefits also did not apply to other investments, be they stocks, bonds or stakes in a small business.

Those gains were all taxed at rates of up to 20 per cent.

The different tax treatments gave people a new incentive to plough ever more money into real estate, and they did so. ‘When you give that big an incentive for people to buy and sell homes,’ said Mr Wampler, ‘they are going to buy and sell homes.’

By itself, the change in the tax law did not cause the housing bubble, economists say. Several other factors – a relaxation of lending standards, a failure by regulators to intervene, a sharp decline in interest rates and a collective belief that house prices could never fall – probably played larger roles.

But many economists say that the law had a noticeable impact, allowing home sales to become tax-free windfalls. A recent study of the provision by an economist at the Federal Reserve suggests that the number of homes sold was almost 17 per cent higher over the last decade than it would have been without the law.

Vernon Smith, a Nobel laureate and economics professor at George Mason University, has said that the tax law change was responsible for ‘fuelling the mother of all housing bubbles’.

The provision – part of a sprawling Bill called the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 – exempted most home sales from capital gains tax. The first US$500,000 in gains from any single-home sale was exempt from tax for a married couple, as long as they had lived in the home for at least two of the previous five years. (For singles, the first US$250,000 was exempt.)

Mr Wampler said that he never sold a home simply because of the law’s existence, but it played a role in his decisions and also became part of his stock pitch to potential customers who were considering buying the homes he was building in the desert. He would point out that the tax benefits would increase their returns on a house, relative to stocks.

During the boom years, he prospered. But today he owns 32 hectares of land on the outskirts of Phoenix that he cannot sell. He owes US$8 million to his banks, which may soon foreclose on his land.

The change in the tax law had its roots in a Chicago speech that Bob Dole, Mr Clinton’s Republican opponent in the 1996 presidential election, gave on Aug 5 of that year. Trailing Mr Clinton in the polls, he came out for an enormous tax cut, including an across-the-board reduction in the capital gains tax.

The proposal made Mr Clinton’s political advisers more nervous than almost anything else during the campaign. The campaign’s chief spokesman, Joe Lockhart, travelled to Chicago to stand outside the ballroom where Mr Dole was speaking and make the case that the Dole tax cut would cause the deficit to soar. At the same time, Mr Clinton’s aides began scrambling to come up with their own tax proposal. Getting rid of capital gains on most home sales seemed like the perfect idea.

Treasury officials had become interested in that provision earlier in Mr Clinton’s term after Jane Gravelle, an economist at the Congressional Research Service, had called it to their attention, according to Eric Toder, an official in the tax policy office at the time. He and his colleagues were looking for ways to simplify the tax code, and Ms Gravelle told them that eliminating capital gains taxes on houses was an excellent candidate.

Three weeks after Mr Dole’s speech, with support from top Treasury officials, the proposal had made it into Mr Clinton’s speech at the Democratic convention. During the presidential debates that followed, he used it to parry Mr Dole’s calls for a big tax cut. The following summer, he signed the provision into law.

Source : Business Times – 22 Dec 2008

Posted in General, Overseas Property | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »