Lushhomemedia

Archive for December 1st, 2008

Moody’s downgrades Fraser Centrepoint Trust

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 1, 2008

Moody’s Investors Service has on Monday downgraded the Fraser Centrepoint Trust’s (‘FCT’) corporate family rating from A3 to Baa1.

The rating remains on review for possible downgrade.

‘The downgrade reflects Moody’s views that FCT is unlikely to grow in the next two years to a scale and diversity that is consistent with its previous rating’, says Kathleen Lee, Moody’s lead analyst for the trust.

‘Consequently, FCT’s relatively small size and asset concentration risk whereby Causeway Point contributes a significant 71% of net profit from its portfolio of 3 retail assets do not support a continuation of its previous rating when compared to similarly rated peers in the REITsector’, adds Lee.

The rating remains on review for downgrade given the use of uncommitted drawn banking facilities to fund capital expenditure. While the amount is relatively small – and with banks with good relationships with FCT — Moody’s believes the continued use of such facilities is a source of weakness especially as the bank lending environment continues to tighten.

Moody’s notes that FCT has reported sustainable income streams, supported by its good quality, well-located and seasoned suburban retail malls which enjoys relatively high entry barriers and is more resilient to economic downturns as tenants mainly provide daily necessities.

The rating review will focus on FCT’s plans to secure committed bank facilities or find alternate mitigating measures to address the weakness of the existing uncommitted facilities and to fund ongoing capital expenditure.

The last rating action was on 20 October, 2008 when the ratings of FCT were placed under review for possible downgrade.

FCT is a Singapore-based real estate investment trust with particular focus on retail properties in Singapore. The trust is sponsored by Frasers Centrepoint Ltd, the wholly owned property arm of F&N group, one of Singapore’s leading shopping centre operators and developers.

Source : Business Times – 1 Dec 2008

Posted in General, REITS | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Rent depends on their earnings

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 1, 2008

Popular eateries at East Coast Seafood Centre up in arms over NParks’ new rental scheme

The more money you make, the more rent I will collect.

That seems to be the message being sent out to tenants at the popular East Coast Seafood Centre by the landlord National Parks Board (NParks). And some seafood restaurants owners are not happy.

The restaurants at the centre include Long Beach, Red House, Jumbo, Hawaii and No Signboard seafood restaurants.

In the past, they were charged rental at a fixed monthly rate. But NParks has revised its rental scheme since July.

Restaurant owners have been asked to pay a percentage of their monthly gross turnover (GTO) or a base rental rate, whichever is higher.

This base rental is also much higher than what they previously paid. The GTO percentage is between 10 and 13.5 per cent.

As all the owners are not charged the same rates, the new scheme has increased their rental by varying amounts. The rates are based on factors such as location of the units and how well the restaurants are doing.

For example, if the old fixed rent was $20,000, the increased base rent would be about $35,000.

With the GTO component, if the restaurant’s earnings are $600,000 for the month, rent would be about $60,000.

Rentals at the East Coast Seafood Centre are reviewed every three years.

The owners who spoke to The New Paper did not want to be identified as they are still in negotiations with NParks.

One owner said: ‘It’s bad enough that the new base rate has increased rental by more than 60 per cent.

‘What’s worse is that now, with the new rental scheme, we pay almost twice as much per square foot as we did before.’

One of their gripes with the GTO component, tied to turnover, is that NParks has not done any advertising or marketing for them.

Another restaurant owner said: ‘The East Coast Seafood Centre is not a place where you just happen to be at any time of the day. We have big advertising and marketing budgets to promote our seafood and get customers here.

‘So the more business we bring in ourselves, the more rental we pay? It doesn’t seem fair.’

All the restaurant owners stressed that they have always had a harmonious landlord-tenant relationship with NParks.

But they are asking for more leeway in rental charges, so they can sell seafood at more reasonable prices.

One said: ‘If we were charged just a fixed, increased base rate, it’s not the best of situations when the economy is down, but I find it still acceptable.

‘With GTO, we may be unprofitable in the long run with our current prices and the amount of discounts given (to our customers).’

NParks explained that the revised rents are based on independent market valuations.

The rents would have been much higher without the GTO component.

Its spokesman said: ‘The independent valuations take into account whether the businesses are doing well. The higher rental reflects that they are doing well.

‘The operators can verify the valuation using their own valuers if they wish to do so.’

On doing its part to attract business, the spokesman said: ‘We do spend a substantial amount of money improving and maintaining our parks, and to make them more vibrant. These do benefit the business amenities in our parks.’

The new rental scheme is to give businesses a fairer deal.

Mr Chuah Hock Seng, director of NParks, said: ‘The variable component is to give the operator a buffer when the market situation is not so good.

‘If the revenue drops below a certain level, the operator pays a lower rental than if the rental is totally fixed. The new rentals are fair, based on the earnings of the current outlets.’

Common in retail sector

When asked, Knight Frank’s deputy managing director, Mr Danny Yeo, said that the GTO rental scheme is commonly practised in the retail sector. This is especially so in shopping malls, where landlords charge an advertising fee to do promotions for their tenants.

Mr Yeo said: ‘For the GTO scheme, advertising is usually a shared responsibility between landlord and tenants.’

Mr Yeo also explained that the GTO rental model would be a better system for tenants.

‘There is more transparency because it shows which businesses are doing well and which are not. This helps the landlord help those who need the help.’

He emphasised that for the GTO rental scheme to work effectively, ‘base rent has to be reasonable and fair’.

One restaurant owner who recently moved into the seafood centre said she would prefer to be charged the GTO rental scheme.

She said: ‘We are new, so our earnings are not high. To pay the newly increased rent is very taxing on us. If it’s GTO, it’s fairer.’

For her, rental is a fixed rate as her restaurant’s earnings do not exceed the cut-off to qualify for the GTO scheme.

Source : New Paper – 1 Dec 2008

Posted in General, Rental | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Deferred payment scheme: Averting a crisis

Posted by luxuryasiahome on December 1, 2008

Act now to contain any fallout from property purchases worth billions of dollars

IN many ways, the credit crisis crippling vast tracts of the global financial system resembles a guerilla war.

It is fiendishly difficult to work out exactly who the enemy is or where he might be lurking.

It is deeply frustrating. Each time a financial firestorm is doused, another even more intense blaze erupts.

Although there seems to be no imminent end to the crisis, there are many useful lessons to be learned from the calamity so far.

Take Citigroup’s recent painful experience, for example. The giant lender had to be saved from potential oblivion by a US government bailout after its share price collapsed, even though it was healthier than other global banks by many measures.

It is a sobering reminder that, in a climate of fear, it is wise to stay a few steps ahead of the crisis, keep tabs on possible flashpoints and defuse them before they become a full-blown crisis.

Until recently, Singapore had been in the fortunate position of having escaped much of the fallout from the crisis.

But since September, jobs have been lost and companies are struggling to rollover their loans. This came after the collapse of US investment bank Lehman Brothers sparked panic among banks, which then clamped down on lending activities.

The fallout has been felt most profoundly in the local property market where soaring prices last year attracted hordes of speculators snapping up condos in the hope of making a quick profit.

This sudden reversal has prompted analysts to raise concerns over possible systemic risks posed to banks from the downward spiral in property prices, given their big exposure to real estate loans.

Their biggest worry is focused on the record 14,811 private properties sold by developers to homebuyers last year.

Many of these flats were sold under a ‘deferred payment scheme’, introduced 10 years ago during the Asian financial crisis to help developers offload unsold properties and which was scrapped only in October last year.

This scheme enabled a homebuyer to pay only the stamp duty and 10 per cent of the purchase price upfront. The rest is paid only when the flat is given its temporary occupation licence (TOP).

At the height of the property market fever last year, the scheme was blamed for fuelling excessive speculation in sought-after condos because they could rapidly change hands several times as prices rose. All the speculator needed was the downpayment for the flat.

It is a completely different story now. By some measures, property prices have fallen back to the levels of last January. This means that many of last year’s new property launches are now under water, and current prices are likely to be less than what buyers paid last year.

Awkward questions are being asked, such as what will happen to buyers on the deferred payment scheme when the condos are completed next year.

Will they simply walk away – writing off their deposits as a loss – and leave the nightmare of reselling the property to the developer? This would depress an already falling property market still further.

And how about those buyers who had the foresight to arrange a bank loan? Will the bank insist on doing a fresh valuation of the property and offer a smaller loan amount? What happens if the buyer cannot make up the difference?

Nobody in the market knows exactly how many of these units were purchased on the deferred payment scheme. And when the scheme potentially covered billions of dollars’ worth of property purchases last year, it raises plenty of concerns.

In a climate of uncertainty, when even big banks can be rocked by a crisis of confidence, the guessing game played by analysts over the scale of this potential problem can easily spread fear among both banks and investors alike.

The Government has sensibly refrained from trying to talk up the property market. Instead it has stated openly that it cannot work against market forces and try to prop up prices artificially.

But it can get the various agencies to work together to produce a breakdown of the homebuyers on the deferred payment scheme – preferably by condo project – along with details of when the projects are likely to be completed.

This would enable all the interested parties – banks, developers and homebuyers – to make an informed decision on the seriousness of the problem and take measures to avert it.

It is very likely that the problem is not a big one and that the banks and developers have been scaring themselves unnecessarily.

Given the low interest rate environment, most genuine buyers may have already opted to make progressive payments as construction proceeds on their dream homes.

So long as they have a job and continue to service their monthly instalments promptly, they are still good credit risks, even though the value of their dream home may have fallen sharply.

But the manner in which the credit crisis has ambushed sound companies and brought them to their knees is scary.

Coming to grips with the deferred payment issue is an exercise worth doing. It will enable us to get ahead of the curve on the credit crisis for a change

Source : Straits Times – 1 Dec 2008

Posted in General, Market Reports | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »