Lushhomemedia

Archive for September 22nd, 2008

Analysts say REITs are good defensive play in current climate

Posted by luxuryasiahome on September 22, 2008

Singapore REITs have been massively sold off since the start of the year – down some 36 per cent on average to date.

This is in line with property developers, whose stocks have fallen some 44 per cent since January.

In comparison the STI is only down about 24 per cent.

But analysts say REITs may be a good defensive play in the current turbulent climate.

Property prices and rental costs have been on the decline this year, with the stock price of developers and investment trusts following suit.

Head of research & consultancy at Chesterton, Colin Tan, said, “Usually REITs is all about property. If prices are declining I’d think you have to move down a bit.”

He said that while rents are locked down for the time being, REITs will eventually be exposed to property market declines.

But others say there is reason to be positive, especially if one looks at REITs in terms of yield and distribution per unit (DPU).

Investment analyst of DMG & Partners, Brandon Lee, said, “What’s persuasive is, we can draw comfort from what happened in the last quarter. Results were pretty healthy at about 33 per cent year to year growth in DPU. Going forward we believe earnings momentum should carry on into the next 1.5 years.

“If you look into the tenure of the leases signed a few years back, even last year or first half this year, they should continue on to the next 1.5 years.”

On top of that, refinancing concerns have been eased somewhat, with most REITs having refinanced within a relatively healthy range of 2.5 to 4 per cent. But not all REITs are equal. DMG prefers those with organic growth drivers, as the acquisition potential of REITs dries up along with liquidity.

Lee said, “My top pick now is Suntec REIT. The investment case is basically the organic growth boosters in the form of positive rental reversions.

“If you look at its current lease in the profile, about 44 per cent of its office spaces are for rental this year and these are paying at S$5 to S$6. If you assume conservative estimates of S$12 – S$15 psf per month it gives you a clear picture on how well it’s going to fare in terms of DPU growth. And aside from that, refinancing concerns for this REIT have also been extinguished.”

Lee’s target price for Suntec REIT is at S$1.87.

Analysts note however, that like all investments, REITs are exposed to macroeconomic conditions beyond the control of their managers.

Asset devaluations and widening interest rate spreads are potential threats, although DMG says softening interest rates from easing inflation and slowing economic growth could cushion the impact.

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 22 Sep 2008

Posted in General, Property Investment, REITS | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

New ’boutique’ home for private bank EFG

Posted by luxuryasiahome on September 22, 2008

DESPITE the current United States credit crunch, the third-largest Swiss private banking group EFG Bank, is expanding here and will be taking up seven floors out of the new nine-storey “boutique” office block opposite the Parliament House.

EFG will be the first private bank to occupy the bulk of a building, and this gives it naming rights for the 78,000-square-foot freehold building.

Said EFG Bank’s managing director Kees Stoute: “Timing-wise it is very interesting, especially with the credit crunch. We are not affected in the sense that we are still growing, and as a company we don’t have any exposure to the credit crunch that you see now.”

EFG Bank Building is located on the sites of the former Satnam House and Amar-raj House. These sites were bought last year for about $50 million for development by RB Capital, a company that focuses on real estate in both Singapore and Malaysia.

The bank will be paying a “low-double-digit” gross monthly rental, and is committed to a long-term lease at the new EFG Building. Office rents in the area range from $8.50 to $16.50 per square foot.

EFG Bank started in Singapore in 2000 and has three outlets to its name: One at OUB Centre, another at Market Street and another at Prudential Towers. Its space at the new EFG Building will be about five times the size of all three locations put together.

The bank has a headcount of 121 people, with 70 customer relationship officers.

Mr Stoute said: “We want to have our own image and positioning. Being at such a prestigious location allows us to be more visible ˜ that’s the main drive of this move. I can’t think of one country in the world where you can have the luxury as a bank to have such good neighbours.”

The bank is expected to move into the building by May next year. EFG Bank Building marks the company’s first venture into property development in Singapore. It will also be moving into the top floor of the new building, with Singapore as its headquarters.

Source : Today – 22 Sep 2008

Posted in General, Office / Retail Space | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Don’t stifle creativity in building design

Posted by luxuryasiahome on September 22, 2008

I REFER to the report, ‘Developers appeal to Govt over bay-windows ruling’ (Sept 13), and Mr Richard Sui’s letter last Wednesday, ‘Please uphold URA guideline’.

I agree with his concerns over environmentally unfriendly bay windows but disagree that the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) should include them (and planter boxes) in gross floor area (GFA) calculations. In fact, by doing so, I thought URA had undone its excellent work of introducing attractive features to the local housing scene by giving clever incentives to developers.

I fear other similarly promoted features like balconies, sky bridges and roof-scape designs may suffer the same fate if the issue is not seen in perspective.

First, bay windows are not intrinsically environmentally unfriendly. They become so through lack of design. The first Singapore project to win the renowned Aga Khan Architectural Award, Moulmein Rise condominium, did so partly due to Woha Design’s creative interpretation of ‘bay windows and planter boxes’.

If developers are penalised for extraneous features, architects will lose the opportunity to experiment beyond the money-making GFA of a building, because the only justification local developers understand is profits.

Second, with the new legislation on energy conservation in buildings enforced this year by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA), there is now an avenue to keep environment-unfriendly designs in check. BCA should put bay-window designs under its microscope. Meanwhile, URA need not duplicate its function but should intensify its good work in promoting a vibrant built environment via its intelligent planning policies.

Lastly, this whole issue was triggered by buyers’ complaints of unscrupulous selling of non-GFA features by developers. Shouldn’t this be tackled through sales-and-purchase regulations instead?

My proposal: Disallow developers from including non-GFA features as part of floor area in sales-and-purchase agreements. Then, leave it to:

~ Developers to factor in their non-GFA capital investment into the selling price;
~ Architects to convince developers that their non-GFA features add value and selling price to the project;
~ Buyers to buy or not at whatever price; and
~ Market forces (society) to influence the outlook of residential architecture.

In this way, developers will not be penalised by the development charge for indulging in architectural articulation, while the onus is back on architects to sell their extraneous features to developers directly and buyers indirectly, as it should be.

Osman Sidek

Source : Straits Times – 22 Sep 2008

Posted in General | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Have estate agents schemes lost their purpose?

Posted by luxuryasiahome on September 22, 2008

FROM the many Forum letters and comments posted in recently, many are still not sure or rather are confused how the Certified Estate Salesperson (CES) course can really serve its purpose, or whether, by passing CES, such agents are qualified to serve the pubic in their HDB Resale housing needs. Many members of the public and practitioners are asking the same questions.

In December 1995, HDB implemented the Listed Housing Agents Scheme (LHAS), until the formation of the Singapore Accredited Estate Agencies (SAEA) scheme in November 2005. HDB has worked with the Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers (SISV) and Institute of Estate Agents (IEA) to develop the accreditation scheme, which shares the same objective of instilling greater professionalism in the estate agency industry. It was supposed to be jointly administered by the SISV and IEA, together with the Ministry of Finance and Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore. This scheme was meant to set the guidelines, minimum educational standards and practice standards for estate agents. Then, agencies under LHAS must adhere to HDB’s strict rules and procedures when handling or submitting HDB resale flat transactions via the online system (Resalenet). As most HDB resale flat transactions are facilitated by housing agents, individual agent must have CEHA as the minimum entry criterion.

SAEA implemented CES, which is a stripped-down version of CEHA. To equate CES with CEHA is not appropriate.

- Can a three-hour HDB topic cover the necessary policies and procedures? Are estate agents who pass the CES course, with 50 out of 100 multiple-choice questions, really qualified to serve buyers and sellers in the HDB resale market or raise professionalism in the real estate industry?

- Does HDB endorse the CES course?

- CEHA has been considered a higher level certification, so what is the rationale for charging $850 for CES but $550 for CEHA?

Tng Bee Lian (Ms)

Source : Straits Times – 22 Sep 2008

Posted in Agents, General | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Paradise Island

Posted by luxuryasiahome on September 22, 2008

A lush sanctuary without compare, Paradise Island features 29 stylish 2-storey villas, which is inspired by the romance of waterfront living and the green lushness of the tropical paradise. Its architecture is of modern tropical style and expressed in clean lines set in a naturalistic lushly landscaped enclave.

Besides individual private berth for luxury boats, each villa design has a private driveway and is uniquely designed with generous terraces extending into a tropical landscape next to waterway, representing the spirit of the cove – a place where one interacts with the water in an exclusive tranquil and comfortable surrounding.

All villas will enjoy full views towards the waterway, and the rooms facing the waterways will have their own private terrace or balcony enhancing their personal space and closeness to the water edge.

No effort has been spared to ensure the intricate balance between the aesthetic and the functional is always maintained, a balance so experientially synergistic yet unobtrusive that you wouldn’t even notice it exists. Subtle details and thoughtful touches define your home at every turn, and help to make every minute spent at home such a variable delight.

Taking a stroll around your beautiful garden and indulged in a relaxing dip in your own personal pool or embark on a starlit cruise to the South China Sea or a breezy after dinner expedition to check out the light-drenched cityscape of Singapore – the choices and possibilities are boundless. Except that answering the call of the oceans is merely an issue of walking to the berth in your backyard.

Location: Sentosa Cove (District 4)
Total Units: 29 villas
Year of Completion: 31 Mar 2009

Contact us at info@lushhomemedia.com or +65 9631 8037 with the following for more information:

Paradise Island / Name / Contact #

Posted in For Sale, General, Landed Property, Luxury Property, Sentosa Property | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments »