Lushhomemedia

Archive for August 30th, 2008

Development charge: Rates tweaked slightly in dull market

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

Bigger cuts in store if stronger evidence of falling property values emerges

Despite weaker property sentiment, the government has opted to leave development charge (DC) rates largely unchanged, except for an average 6.3 per cent cut for non-landed residential use.

There may not be sufficient evidence of declines in property values yet, market watchers said, but the rates could be cut at the next revision if stronger evidence emerges to show values are falling.

DC rates, which may be payable for enhancing the use of some sites, are revised twice yearly, on March 1 and Sept 1, by the Ministry of National Development in consultation with the Chief Valuer.

DC rates are stated across 118 geographical sectors. MND announced changes to boundaries affecting eight geographical sectors in three vicinities – the Race Course Road area (following the realignment of Race Course Road after the completion of Farrer Park MRT Station), Jurong Lakeside area (where there are plans under draft Master Plan 2008) and Pulau Brani (which has been moved out of the geographical sector that includes Sentosa).

Jones Lang LaSalle’s analysis shows that a site redesignated from one sector to another in the Jurong Lakeside area could see increases in DC rates of 35 per cent for landed residential use, 39 per cent for hotel use and 38 per cent for industrial use based on Sept 1, 2008 rates.

As for the minimal changes in DC rates for most use groups, CB Richard Ellis executive director Li Hiaw Ho said this was in line with the slow pace of public and private land transactions seen this year.

Knight Frank managing director Tan Tiong Cheng said: ‘For the commercial (office, retail) sector, we do not have direct evidence to show land values have dropped. For residential, the collective sales market has quietened but there has been evidence at recent state land tenders to show a decline in land values.’

That could account for the chops in DC rates for non-landed residential use.

Jones Lang LaSalle head of research (Southeast Asia) Chua Yang Liang too pointed to several cases of 99-year condo sites being sold at state land tenders recently at prices below their March 1, 2008 DC rate-implied land values.

DC rates for non-landed residential use were trimmed in 116 of the 118 locations. The cuts ranged from 3.8 per cent (in the Pasir Ris/Loyang and Punggol areas) to 10.8 per cent in the Balestier area. Recent transacted prices for non-landed projects like The Marque, Vutton and Pavilion 11 might have been the reason for the DC cut. The rate for Sentosa was trimmed 10.5 per cent, perhaps based on prices achieved recently at condos like Marina Collection and Turquoise at Sentosa Cove.

Two adjacent geographical sectors covering Ang Mo Kio/Bishan and Braddell/Potong Pasir, saw respective cuts of 10 per cent and 9.4 per cent. The cuts could be due to a 99-year condo site at Lorong 2/3 Toa Payoh near Braddell MRT Station being sold in April at 23 per cent below the price paid for a condo site next to Ang Mo Kio Hub in September last year.

DC rates for landed residential, commercial and hotel uses were completely untouched across the 118 geographical sectors. For industrial use, the rate was increased 11.1 per cent in the Paya Lebar/Eunos area but unchanged in the other 117 locations.

CBRE’s Mr Li said the latest DC rate revisions were ‘pretty much an academic exercise as there aren’t many en bloc sales or redevelopments of sites going on which would involve DC payments’.

‘Nobody is getting excited; there’s little practical effect.’

Source : Business Times – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in Developer News, General, Govt Policy, Property Development | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

Shunfu Ville gets HDB approval to go private

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

SHUNFU Ville, an HUDC estate in Marymount Road, has been privatised.

The Housing Board (HDB) approved the required mandate for the estate to go private more than a week ago.

Out of 18 HUDC estates in Singapore, Shunfu Ville is the 13th to go private.

In April, my paper reported that a mass-signing exercise by residents of its 358 units had secured enough votes to go ahead with the move.

This was after an unsuccessful exercise in 2001 held by Shunfu’s pro-tem committee, which fell short of the 75 per cent of votes needed. At the time, only 50 per cent agreed to privatisation.

According to the chairman of the committee, Mr Philip Liau, 57, gaining approval from the flat owners had not been easy.

Some residents were reluctant because of the uncertain economic outlook and the high cost of privatisation, a media report said.

Now, Shunfu’s residents are allowed to sub-let their units without prior approval from HDB. They will also be allowed to purchase a second property.

Lessees will be able to re-finance or re-mortgage their properties.

When an estate is made private, HDB takes over the ownership of common areas, such as carparks, along with the management of the estate from the town councils.

Source : My Paper – 29 Aug 2008

Posted in General | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

MediaCorp’s mocca.com partners property giant to give customers better experience

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

Singapore real estate agency, HSR, has partnered mocca – MediaCorp’s Online Communities and Classified Advertising – to reach a wider audience.

The collaboration is the first of its kind between a real estate giant and an online classifieds portal.

With the combined strengths of HSR and mocca, house hunting has become easier.

You can now expect more information and better service with user-friendly tools such as maps and previously-transacted prices.

Timothy Goh, vice-president for MediaCorp’s new media business, said: “This will gyrate the whole industry to look at mocca differently. It would gyrate more other agents to look at it and say, ‘hey! look, the time to be on the internet is now’. And if a leading agency as big as HSR has come on, that says something about mocca and its movement.”

For HSR agents constantly on the move, they will now have the luxury of a dedicated hotline service, where officers can help place their ads with just a telephone call.

The mocca-HSR partnership was sealed and witnessed on Wednesday by about 500 real estate professionals at an event at the Caldecott Broadcast Centre.

Patrick Liew, CEO of HSR Property Consultants, said: “The real estate agents of the 21st century have to be using the Internet, and the best system we can use on the Internet is mocca dot com. Because through mocca dot com, we can not only list our property, we can give a lot more information.”

Formed in 2007, mocca has a subscriber base of some 100,000 members.

Source : Channel NewsAsia – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in Agents, General | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Dip in property development fees

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

Lower charges for non- landed private homes – first time in 5 years – reflect fall in land values

ANOTHER sign that the values of land and private homes are sliding arrived yesterday in the form of the new property development charges.

These charges, which reflect changes in land and property values over the last six months, were lowered for residential apartments and condominium units for the first time in five years.

Aside from prime locations, city fringe areas similar to this one off Newton Road are always development rates have dropped the most. — ST FILE PHOTO

Property consultants were not surprised. They had expected fees in this sector to stay stable or dip slightly, given that the only residential plots sold in the past six months were state-owned parcels that transacted at fairly low prices.

No area was spared, with rates for non-landed residential homes falling across the board by an average of 6 per cent islandwide.

The move was the ‘first signal from official sources that some values in the property market are falling’, said Mr Nicholas Mak, director of research and consultancy at Knight Frank.

The Government levies development charges on developers who want to build a new, bigger development on an existing site they have bought.

The fees are categorised by sector and location. They are revised every six months by the chief valuer, based on transactions of land and property in the past half-year.

Lower charges imply that recent land and property deals have been transacted at lower prices, and also mean that it will be cheaper for developers to buy and redevelop a collective-sale site, for instance.

But property consultants do not expect the new lower charges to revive the deathly quiet collective-sale market.

‘The rise in construction costs is higher than the fall in development charges. So total development cost would still increase,’ said Mr Mak.

Developers may also hold out for further decreases in development charges in the next revision in March, he added.

‘All we need is another quarter of weak sentiment and chances are, six months from now, there could be more downward revision in the charges.’

Mr Li Hiaw Ho, executive director of CB Richard Ellis (CBRE) Research, also expects development charges to fall again in upcoming revisions.

‘In the next 12 to 18 months, development charges might move downwards moderately to reflect a scenario of realistic consolidation after the run-up in land prices in the past two years,’ he said.

This time around, the falls in fees for non-landed residential land ranged from 3.85 per cent to 10.77 per cent, depending on location.

Areas where rates dropped most included prime locations such as Ardmore Park and Sentosa, city fringe districts like Balestier, Keng Lee and Kallang, and suburban regions such as Bayshore and Bishan.

Apart from non-landed residential land, development charges barely budged in other sectors, reflecting the lack of activity and flat prices in the broader property market.

The fees for land to be used for offices, shops, landed homes, hospitals or hotels remained unchanged across all locations in Singapore.

For industrial land, charges rose only in the Ubi and Kaki Bukit area. They went up 11.1 per cent, possibly due to the recent sale of an industrial site in Ubi Avenue 4/Ubi Road 2 in April, suggested CBRE’s Mr Li.

HIGHER TOTAL COST

‘The rise in construction costs is higher than the fall in development charges. So total development cost would still increase.’- Mr Nicholas Mak, director of research and consultancy at Knight Frank, on the lower property development fees

Source : Straits Times – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in General, Govt Policy, Property Development | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

A squeeze, but it’s still home to family

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

FOR two weeks in April, the Shankars and their newborn daughter stayed at a temporary shelter for displaced families.

Home was a three-room HDB flat in Marsiling, which they shared with two other families.

Mr Shankar Ramu, 26, recalls: ‘We took one room. One family was in the other room, and the other family was in the hall.’

They had no qualms about living in close proximity with others.

‘Our daughter was only two months old, and we had nowhere to go.’

The Shankars were caught in a bind after their marriage last September.

They had applied for a subsidised HDB rental flat at the time, but were told they would have to wait a year or so.

They ruled out buying a new or resale flat because, with their unstable income and only $5,000 in CPF savings, they were not sure they could afford it.

Mr Shankar’s predicament stems from having spent his early 20s in prison and not being able to find a better-paying job later because of his low educational qualifications.

He had studied only up to Secondary 3 level during his five years in jail.

After his release in 2006, he took up odd jobs moving furniture from homes.

He would earn $1,300 in a good month. But in other months, he had no work at all or failed to turn up for work, he admits during his interview with The Straits Times.

His wife Pushparani, 24, was earning $700 a month as a carpark attendant until she gave birth.

It did not help that Mr Shankar could not get along with his wife’s family, and vice-versa.

The couple lived in separate places after their marriage: Mr Shankar at his sister’s flat in Woodlands while his wife lived in her father’s flat in Yishun.

Matters came to a head when their baby was born.

They sought help from Sembawang GRC MP Mohamad Maliki Osman and were given a place at a shelter run by New Hope Community Services, a voluntary welfare organisation.

The stay at the shelter gave Mr Shankar time to find a new job.

He now earns a regular monthly salary of $1,300 as a warden of a student hostel in Katong.

About $300 of his income goes towards renting a room in a friend’s HDB flat in Boon Lay. A further $100-plus goes towards milk and diapers for four-month-old Durgashini, and $100 to top up his ez-link card for travel on buses and MRT trains.

Some of the pay also goes to cigarettes for him, and pocket money for his wife.

He has set his priorities.

‘My goal now is to work hard and bring up my daughter.’

He adds: ‘We are waiting for our rental flat. If we like it, we will stay there.

‘If not, we will save money and buy a flat.’

Hope and help for families without a home

A temporary home

~ The temporary shelter run by New Hope Community Services for displaced families is the first of its kind in Singapore.
~ Families are referred by family service centres and community development councils (CDCs).
~ They stay up to three months in HDB flats and pay a monthly fee of $50 to $150 which covers utilities.
~ Social workers help them in their search for longer-term housing, as well as in budgeting, finding a job and putting their children in school.
~ New Hope has helped 45 families since it opened in June last year.

Source : Straits Times – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in General, HDB News | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

HDB subsidised rental flats: A deeper, longer-term problem?

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

The demand for subsidised rental flats has risen, a phenomenon highlighted by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his recent National Day Rally address. Is the surge temporary or here to stay, and can supply keep up with demand? Insight examines the issue.

MR SHANKAR Ramu and his wife, both in their mid-20s, have been in the queue for an HDB rental flat for almost a year.

For now, the couple and their four-month-old daughter are holed up in a friend’s two-room flat in Boon Lay.

Their year-long wait for a heavily subsidised flat is typical these days. In 2006, the wait would have been two to six months. Today, it is nine to 18 months.

The longer queue is a reflection of the current surge in the demand for HDB rental flats.

Officials, MPs and commentators have linked the surge to the recent rise in property prices.

They suspect that much of it has to do with people, especially the elderly, offloading their flats now, either to repay debts or simply to have more cash.

But experts also point to deeper social issues that may sustain or even increase the demand for subsidised rental flats in the longer term.

Having more budget rental options may be the way to ease this demand, they argue, but that will impinge on the current cornerstone of public housing policy for Singaporeans to own their homes. More on that later.

Cashing out?

FUELLING the current high demand for the rental flats, observers say, are those who bought their flats around the time when HDB prices peaked in 1996.

In the downturn that followed, many could not sell their units without making a huge loss.

But in the last year or so, the property market has picked up. Resale flat prices have rocketed.

The result, observers say, is that many people have been offloading their flats to repay debts.

Having done that, they find that they cannot afford to rent an HDB flat in the open market because rentals have also gone up.

Real-estate agency PropNex’s CEO, Mr Mohamed Ismail, says they would have to fork out at least $1,500 to $2,000 a month to rent a three-room HDB flat. This is up from $700 two years ago.

The highly subsidised rental flat then becomes an attractive option.

Depending on their incomes, tenants pay roughly $30 to $180 a month for a one-room flat, and $60 to $240 for a two-room unit.

The rent is pegged at no more than 50 per cent of market rent. For those with little or no income, they may even pay less than 15 per cent of the market rent.

The profile of rental flat applicants appears to corroborate this theory.

Many of them do not appear outright down and out, even though they may meet the criterion of not earning more than $1,500 a month.

There is another eligibility criterion – they must not have sold a flat in the past 30 months – but applicants can appeal for this to be waived, on the basis of a lack of family support or other extenuating circumstances such as divorce and bankruptcy.

Of the 4,671 applicants last year, four in 10 were former home owners who were not affected by mortgage arrears or divorce.

If the current surge is indeed buoyed by higher property prices, it will be subject to the property cycle. This means that the surge will be temporary and will fade in a property downturn.

Mr Ismail, for one, does not see the current high tide of property and rental prices ebbing much in the next three years.

The pipeline of large-scale projects coming in during that period looks set to sustain the economy. More foreigners will be needed here to work, and they will rent homes and boost rental prices.

Demand for resale flats will also remain strong, partly because permanent residents increasingly find buying a resale flat better value than renting one.

‘It makes no sense for them to rent a flat for $2,000 when they can buy an HDB resale flat and pay a monthly instalment of only $1,000,’ he says.

However, a look at the number of rental flat applications for the last 15 years suggests that the link between property prices and the demand for rental flats is not so simple.

For instance, although the number of applications did decline in the period from 1996 (7,428) to 2000 (3,793), in line with property prices, the decline actually started in 1991.

The increase in rental flat applications began in 2001, even though the property market was still in the doldrums at the time, notes Associate Professor Tu Yong of the National University of Singapore’s department of real estate.

So what other factors might have played a part in raising demand?

In October 2001, the Government announced that it would spend $170 million to upgrade rental flats.

This included having the lifts stop at every floor, repainting the blocks as well as installing new window and toilet fittings.

The result: These flats became a more attractive option.

The Government indicated last Saturday that it could put in place stricter rules to keep out applicants who may not be so needy.

One of them is that the HDB will scrutinise the assets, including private property, of siblings and children of applicants to ensure that they rely first on family for their housing needs, not on rental flats.

Another will require flat sellers to deposit part of their sales proceeds in their Central Provident Fund accounts.

These measures, if implemented, should go some way towards reducing the number of the not-so-needy people in the queue.

Expect even more demand

FOR many years, most of the people in rental flats were the truly needy – people with little or no income, no assets and no family support.

This is still the case today. There are 35,725 households (88 per cent) in rental flats who earn $800 or less a month; and another 4,293 (11 per cent) earning between $801 and $1,500.

They belong to Singapore’s bottom 20 per cent of income earners.

Some 4,700 households also owe rent for three months or more.

HDB figures suggest that the majority of people living in rental flats today are older individuals, rather than poor, young families with many children.

Seventy per cent are residents above 50 years of age, and over 75 per cent are small households with fewer than three people.

However, over the next 10, 20 or 30 years, will the numbers in this group shrink, stay the same or grow?

Many factors come into play, including the state of the economy and the consequent level of sustained unemployment, as well as the efficacy of government policies and community efforts to help people break out of the poverty cycle.

Two groups are of particular concern: low-wage workers who have little education and skills, and the elderly.

Economist Tan Khee Giap reckons that current tenants of subsidised rental flats who are in their early 50s, with little skill and education, are likely to remain in the flats for the next 20 years.

He notes: ‘These are the people who are the most difficult to be upgraded. They earn $1,500 and below, have low skills and low productivity. Such labour is in abundant supply in the region.’

Their children, coupled with a good education system, are their best hope of moving out of a rental flat, he said.

‘Hopefully the next generation who are at least ITE (Institute of Technical Education) graduates wouldn’t be in this position and will be able to command a higher salary.’

Another issue is the impending surge of seniors when the first batch of post-war baby boomers reaches 65 years of age in 2012.

The number of residents aged 65 years or older is expected to multiply threefold to 900,000 in 2030.

Particularly worrying are the lowly-educated women now in their 50s, says Dr Mary Ann Tsao, president of the Tsao Foundation, a non-profit group dedicated to helping the elderly.

They may have been housewives all their lives, with little CPF or private savings.

When they grow older and are widowed, chances are that they will sell their flats and move in with their children.

But if their relationships with their children or daughter-in-law turn sour, they may have to move out.

‘They are not in dire poverty, but they would be better off in their own flat,’ says Dr Tsao.

Why families cannot accommodate the elderly among them, and how this trend will play out in the years to come are complex issues.

Those who work with such families say that the elderly may want their own freedom, or the children may have their own financial burdens to bear.

The upshot is that many more people from this group may also want to join the queue for subsidised rental flats, if there are no good alternatives.

Currently, some can downgrade to a smaller flat or to a studio apartment.

Dr Tsao’s view is that more solutions need to be explored, including the option to rent.

Some of the elderly may not want to continue to own a home. ‘They do not have arrears, but they may not have a lot of cash,’ she notes.

The Government’s answer is a new plan for the elderly who own two- and three-room flats to sell part of their lease back to the HDB and receive $550 each month.

But it is still an open question if the scheme, to start from January next year, will provide enough cash, notes Dr Tsao.

She suggests providing rental options priced somewhere between those in the open market and heavily subsidised rental flats.

There could also be a subsidy for these elderly people which is not as large as that for the truly needy.

Re-examining home ownership?

SINGAPORE officials will go to Hong Kong next month to study the territory’s rental flat system, where some 30 per cent of its population live in public rental flats.

This compares with under 1 per cent for Singapore.

Any suggestion of providing Singaporeans with more support to rent homes or providing public rental flats for those who are not as needy must contend with the overall policy of encouraging home ownership.

Mooted in 1964, the policy aims to ensure that Singaporeans have a stake in the well-being of the country, and will have an asset they can encash in their golden years.

As National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan noted in an interview with reporters last week: ‘Our housing policy is premised on home ownership. Rental flats are there because we recognise that there is a small group of people who cannot afford to own flats.’

Indeed, every month, about 35 households move on from their rental flats to buy one, the HDB says.

Another 100 or so may move out to join their family members, or die of old age. Even so, 382 new applicants join the queue.

Experts say there will be people who would rather rent a flat and spend their money elsewhere, than invest in a home and struggle with mortgage payments.

Renting a flat is also more liquid. It does not subject a person’s wealth to property cycles.

The issue of rootedness is also more than just about owning a home on the island and thus being willing to defend it.

Associate Professor Ngiam Tee Liang, from the National University of Singapore’s social work department, said: ‘We should not worry if it’s not 100 per cent ownership.

‘It does not mean that anybody who is in a rental flat will not be less rooted, just as it does not mean that those who purchase a flat will be more rooted, as they can sell their place and retire abroad.’

Can building keep pace with demand?

HDB has said that it plans to increase its current stock of rental flats from 42,800 to 49,860 by end-2011.

Asked about its projections, HDB says: ‘We may build even more if need be. However, HDB remains committed to keeping home ownership affordable for the vast majority of the population. As such, we do not see the rental stock increasing indefinitely.’

PropNex’s Mr Ismail notes that if the surge continues, the gradual increase in supply over three years may not be sufficient to meet demand.

He suggests a quicker way: Buy back old flats and rent them out.

Others have suggested converting more unsold smaller units for fixed-term leases.

Ultimately, the people who are waiting in line will be the ones who will bear the brunt of any mismatch of supply and demand.

Retiree Amy Tan, 75, had been renting a room in a friend’s flat in Henderson Road while waiting for a rental flat.

‘It’s not easy to rent a room in someone else’s flat. This thing you can’t do, that thing you can’t do,’ said the single woman.

After a wait of 16 months, she finally moved into a one-room rental flat in Telok Blangah Crescent earlier this month.

Rentals in numbers

40,556 – Number of households living in rental flats

35,725 – Number of these households earning less than $800 a month

4,293 – Number of these households earning between $801 and $1,500

70% – Of those living in rental flats are aged 50 and above

$30-$180 - Approximate cost of renting a one-room flat from the Government

$60-$240 – Approximate cost of renting a two-room unit from the Government

Source : Straits Times – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in General, HDB News | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Music and F&B close to home?

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

COMING near you in the neighbourhood: hot food, cold beer and live entertainment.

At least, that is the plan if a bid by the authorities to help businesses create more vibrant residential areas around the island passes muster in a public consultation.

Businesses in the food and beverage industry now climb a mountain of red tape if they want to give patrons something a little different – for example, a restaurant cannot have live music unless it applies to be a nightclub, and a food kiosk cannot serve freshly cooked food unless it applies to cook on the premises.

But if the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) decides to tweak current planning guidelines, it means less form-filling and bureaucracy for businesses and increased vibrancy in residential areas.

Though it would apply to all businesses, where it would have the most impact would be in quiet residential neighbourhoods.

It could create more magnets around the island like Thomson Village on Upper Thomson Road, Jalan Legundi in Sembawang, and Holland Village, and potentially more nuisance as well as convenience for residents.

But the public will have a say in whether this happens.

The URA is canvassing public feedback through an online survey which will be on the website www.ura.gov.sg from Monday till Sept 30.

It wants to focus on businesses in private shophouses near residential areas, as these are places where the changes will likely have the most impact, said URA officials in a media briefing yesterday. There are currently 2,500 such shophouses around the island.

Current rules forbid regular performances of live music and entertainment – whether it is a violinist serenading diners nightly, or a resident rock band playing for barflies – in restaurants and pubs in residential areas. Owners of such businesses usually have to apply for change-of-use permission for nightclub status.

Food shops – takeaway food counters that have no dining areas – are also not allowed to have cooking facilities unless they apply for approval.

If the URA decides to relax guidelines, businesses no longer have to go through a two-week change-of-use application process that can cost $800.

Restaurant owner Melissa Chong gave the move the thumbs-up.

‘I think flexibility is always good for any business, especially now Singaporeans are looking for more interesting experiences.

‘If we want to create something special to attract guests but have to go through a lot of red tape, we may just forget about it,’ said Ms Chong, who runs the restaurant Peaberry and Pretzel in Sunset Way.

But while restaurants, food shops and pubs can be a good thing for a neighbourhood, ‘they can also potentially create noise, smell as well as traffic and parking issues,’ said Mr Han Yong Hoe, URA’s director of development control.

The URA has received a steadily increasing number of complaints from residents about disturbances from nearby businesses. They have got 16 complaints this year already, compared with 13 for all of 2006.

Gripes range from too-loud screenings of football matches outside pubs, to restaurant patrons taking up precious parking space.

One resident, officials revealed, even complained about the pungent smell of fried hae bee hiam (dried shrimp chilli) coming from a nearby restaurant, which permeated her drying laundry.

SPECIAL ATTRACTION

‘I think flexibility is always good for any business, especially now Singaporeans are looking for more interesting experiences…If we want to create something special to attract guests but have to go through a lot of red tape, we may just forget about it.’ - Restaurant owner Melissa Chong

Source : Straits Times – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in General | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

URA in eatery, nightspot review

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

THE Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) is reviewing the activities allowable in restaurants, food shops and pubs located in private shophouses.

One of the considerations is to allow more flexibility in providing live entertainment on the premises of restaurants and pubs.

Currently, live music and performances are not allowed in restaurants at private shophouses near residential estates.

URA has allowed pubs to operate along some main roads on the fringe of residential estates, but live entertainment is not allowed either.

Under URA’s guidelines, the primary purpose for ‘restaurants’ is the sale of food while that of bars and pubs is the sale of alcoholic drinks.

As such, any restaurant, bar or pub that wants to provide live entertainment will need to apply to URA for a ‘change-of-use’. For instance, a pub might need to be designated a ‘nightclub’ instead, as the guidelines for nightclubs do allow for the sale of alcoholic drinks with singing, dancing or live entertainment.

And the operator will still need to comply with licensing controls of various agencies such as the National Environmental Agency, the Police Entertainment Licensing Unit (PELU) and even the Land Transport Authority, depending on the traffic conditions. However, the process of applying for these licences is not as odious as it may sound.

An operator of a bar close to a residential neighbourhood who did not want to be named said that he had applied for and received a licence for live entertainment from PELU quite quickly. However, he was not aware that he also had to apply to URA for a ‘change-of-use’.

Indeed, URA reveals that for the last three years, it has approved five applications for ‘change-of-use’ from restaurant to nightclub and one application from pub to nightclub.

A restaurant operator that provides occasional live entertainment (who also did not want to be named) revealed that after checking with PELU, it found that it was exempt for having to apply for a licence at all.

According to the Public Entertainment and Meetings Act, it does appear that PELU exempts certain performances from requiring licences if, for instance, these end before 10.30pm and the event is not held at the same place for more than three consecutive days within a month.

More flexibility will favour the business community. However, as the operators that BT spoke with have found, the neighbourhood residents are not always happy.

Source : Business Times – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in General | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

CapitaLand divests stake in KL tower

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

CAPITALAND is divesting its 30 per cent stake in a company that owns Menara Citibank, a 50-storey office tower in Kuala Lumpur’s Jalan Ampang, for RM176 million (S$75.5 million). Upon completing the divestment, the Singapore-based property giant will recognise a gain of about S$22.1 million.

The company being divested is Inverfin Sdn Bhd, whose principal asset is Menara Citibank. CapitaLand and the other Inverfin shareholders – Citibank (50 per cent) and Lion Group (20 per cent) – are selling their respective shareholdings in Inverfin to IOI Corporation Bhd.

The total consideration for the divestment is RM586.7 million and based on the net asset value of Inverfin which values the property at about RM733.6 million, this works out to about RM1,000 per square foot of net lettable area for the freehold property.

CB Richard Ellis Singapore and RE Group Associates Sdn Bhd acted for Inverfin’s shareholders.

CapitaLand Commercial Ltd CEO Wen Khai Meng said the group will recycle or redeploy proceeds from the divestment to tap on new opportunities in the growing Malaysian market.

The Malaysian real estate market continues to enjoy good growth underpinned by the country’s healthy economic performance, CapitaLand said in a statement yesterday.

Riding on this positive backdrop, CapitaLand has continued to expand its investments in Malaysia through Quill Capita Trust (QCT), which owns nine properties in Cyberjaya and Klang Valley. In addition, CapitaLand manages the US$30 million Mezzo Capital Fund, which has invested in five residential projects in Kuala Lumpur, and the US$270 million Malaysia Commercial Development Fund (MCDF).

MCDF holds stakes in two sites in Kuala Lumpur Sentral to build offices and serviced apartments with retail amenities, and has other projects located in quality residential and commercial precincts including Mont’ Kiara and the Kuala Lumpur City Centre area.

The group is planning to list a Malaysian mall real estate investment trust (Reit) this year, barring unfavourable market conditions. The new Reit will initially comprise three shopping malls worth RM2 billion – Penang’s Gurney Plaza, and Mines Shopping Fair and Sungei Wang Plaza in Klang Valley.

Source : Business Times – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in Developer News, General, Overseas Property | Tagged: , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Lian Beng files $9.4m suit against ex-partner Manhattan

Posted by luxuryasiahome on August 30, 2008

CONTRACTOR Lian Beng Group has sued its former partner Manhattan Resources for alleged breach of a deal to buy the former’s half stake in a joint venture.

Lian Beng said in a statement yesterday that it has filed a claim with the High Court against Manhattan for allegedly defaulting on a sales and purchase agreement signed between the two companies in 2007. It is seeking specific performance and/or damages. Both are Singapore Exchange mainboard-listed companies.

Lian Beng announced in July last year that is has entered into an agreement with Manhattan for the latter to acquire Lian Beng’s 50 per cent stake or its two million shares in their joint venture Lian Beng Energy.

This joint venture was formed in 2004 to take on an overburden removal contract for a coal mine in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Upon completion of the sale, Lian Beng Energy was set to become a wholly owned subsidiary of Manhattan.

Under the terms of agreement, Manhattan was given nine months to call for a general meeting to get shareholder approval for the transaction but Lian Beng claims it has not done so.

Manhattan – formerly Links Island Holdings – confirmed the suit in a filing to the exchange yesterday. It said Lian Beng is seeking specific performance or alternatively damages of up to $9.4 million for the alleged breach. Manhattan said it is ’seeking legal advice’ on the lawsuit.

Separately, ASL Marine Holdings yesterday announced that its associated company – ASL Energy (ASLE) – has disposed off a floating transfer station for US$33.2 million. ASLE is jointly controlled by ASL Marine and Manhattan.

This 65,000 deadweight tonne floating coal terminal pontoon has been chartered to PT Dermaga Perkasapratama for 10 years.

In June this year, Manhattan had also agreed to buy the other 50 per cent of shares in ASLE that it does not already own from ASL Marine for $22.37 million.

The deal additionally required Manhattan to take over an interest-free loan of $12.5 million that ASL Marine had previously extended to ASLE, taking the total completion amount to $34.87 million.

Manhattan shares were up 3.8 per cent to close at $0.68 yesterday.

Source : Business Times – 30 Aug 2008

Posted in Construction, General | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »