Lushhomemedia

Archive for April 23rd, 2008

Inflation is a serious problem, or is it?

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

IMF’s global measure shows the rates have been relatively good in recent years

IS INFLATION a problem? This is one of the key global issues at the moment. In recent years the world economy has boomed, but that boom did not trigger the type of inflation that one might normally have expected with rapid economic growth.

Meaty issue: Asset prices are falling in many places, instead we are seeing a rise in the relative prices of some food and energy. Food accounts for a large component of the main inflation measures in countries such as China

Instead, most headline rates of inflation around the world have stayed relatively low in recent years. Now, in most countries, headline rates of inflation are rising, despite intense global competition, as food and energy prices rise.

The International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) measure of global inflation provides a good insight into the recent favourable inflation environment. According to the IMF, consumer price inflation in the emerging and developing countries averaged 51.4 per cent during the 1990s, but in recent years has been only 6.6 per cent (in 2003), 5.9 per cent (2004), 5.7 per cent (2005), 5.4 per cent (2006), rising to 6.4 per cent in 2007.

Thus current inflation worries need to be put in the context of what went before. Even allowing for this, there is no room for complacency. The IMF expects 7.4 per cent consumer price inflation this year, decelerating to 5.7 per cent in 2009 and 4.5 per cent in 2010. This is low. Many regions have seen dramatic improvements over recent decades, such as Africa and Eastern Europe.

Developing Asia, meanwhile, saw relatively low inflation through the 1990s of 8.6 per cent, decelerating in the early part of this decade before picking up in recent years from 3.8 per cent in 2005 to 4.1 per cent in 2006 and 5.3 per cent in 2007, and the rate is expected by the IMF to reach 5.9 per cent this year.

The IMF includes Hong Kong, Singapore, Korea and Taiwan in advanced economies, whilst China and other Asian economies are included in developing Asia – this definition breakdown does not alter the overall picture.

For the advanced economies, consumer price inflation averaged 3.0 per cent during the 1990s, and the highest it has reached on an annual basis this decade was 2.4 per cent in 2006; but this year the IMF is expecting 2.6 per cent, led by the US.

The GDP deflator, a broader measure of inflation, shows a similar trend for the industrialised economies, albeit at slightly lower rates.

Many factors accounted for this period of relatively low inflation in recent years. One of the key ones was the world boom that occurred after a period of relatively moderate growth, and thus there was ample spare capacity in the world economy.

China factor

That is, there was plenty of scope for growth to accelerate before any bottlenecks were hit. Another factor was the emergence of China. The shift of global manufacturing from the West to the East has been an ongoing feature of recent decades which have seen Asia move from producing cheap, low-quality goods to producing cheap, but much higher-quality, goods.

China has resulted in a flood of cheap goods and has ensured the scale and pace of change is far more dramatic. And despite the appreciation of the yuan, these goods are still much cheaper than the places in the West in which they might previously have been produced.

The share of world GDP that is moving to the developing world is rising. Indeed, I have often said that CPI figures (consumer price indices) should have been renamed China Price Indices, such was the impact of China!

China’s increased production of cheap goods has had a profound impact on global competition too, forcing firms around the world to squeeze further savings out of their supply chain. This is still an ongoing development.

Another vital factor contributing to low global inflation has been the credible macro-economic policy environment. Take Africa, for example, where a decade ago high inflation, depreciating currencies and high interest rates were typical of most countries. Now currencies are more stable, rates lower.

But, more generally, in many countries around the world, political parties on the Left and the Right have often adopted similar, anti-inflationary monetary policies.

Yet, the picture was not that clear-cut. There has been much debate about whether inflation has been measured properly, particularly in the US. I am not convinced by the criticism of the data, but one has to be sure about what the inflation measure is actually measuring!

As we have said many times, even though headline inflation as measured by consumer price figures has been low in recent years, there has been inflation but in other areas. In particular, whilst headline inflation has been low, in recent years we have seen rapid asset price inflation in many countries, with rising prices of real estate and equities.

In many instances this has not been captured in the headline inflation measures.

Meanwhile, there is still intense global competition in internationally traded goods. The appreciation of the yuan is adding to concern that China’s deflationary impact is disappearing.

Now asset prices are falling in many places. But instead we are seeing a rise in the relative prices of some food and energy. These are captured in the main inflation measures. Indeed, sometimes they are a large component. For instance, in China, food makes up about a third of the basket. This is leading to a focus again on so-called cost-push inflation, and whether rising costs of key factors can lead to overall inflation.

The last time there was a global focus on cost-push inflation was in the 1970s, when oil prices rose. How this feeds through in inflation depends, crucially, on two factors – the reaction of central banks and whether they accommodate this pick-up in prices or not – and whether the rise in costs feeds through into higher wages and into higher inflation expectations.

On that the jury is still out. In many poor countries, riots in reaction to higher food prices are often not a sign of rising inflation but more a reaction to an increase in prices that is not feeding through into higher wages, and that is both reducing the amount of food that people can buy and also squeezing the amount that they can spend on other items.

This deflationary impact of rising food prices is often overlooked. This explains the present challenge.

The writer is chief economist and group head of global research, Standard Chartered Bank, United Kingdom

Source : Business Times – 23 Apr 2008

Posted in General, Global Economy | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

China: Property tax unlikely this year

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

Technical, political issues need to be ironed out first, say officials, analysts

China will not start to levy a general property tax in 2008, because many technical and political issues need to be worked out first, according to officials and analysts.

Talk of the tax, which would replace the existing web of levies and fees related to property and land, has been swirling in the market since 2003.

Renewed rumours about the tax, along with worries about other measures to cap prices, have hit property shares in recent weeks.

Analysts say it could potentially not only streamline the taxation system but also discourage speculation. But it has yet to materialise even as real estate prices have soared in recent years.

‘It’s an arduous and long-term task to establish a reasonable and standardised property tax system,’ Zhou Yin, a deputy division head of the State Administration of Taxation, told a forum in Beijing on Monday.

Others agreed that there was a lot still to do before it would become feasible.

Long Guoqiang, a senior economist who has advised the government on the issue, said tax offices still needed to do a lot work to build databases on the amount of land and number of properties, as well as their changing prices. Intensive training of staff to conduct appraisals is also needed, he said, as are adjustments to the models used to assess the value of property in particular cities.

However, Gary Cornia, a board member of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy in the US, said Chinese tax officials, in Beijing and nationwide, clearly understand the technical issues involved in administering the property tax. ‘The question is: is there the political will to do that, or are the political costs so high that even with the political will, it might not be worth it?’ he asked at the forum.

Mr Zhou noted that the property tax reform aimed to give local governments a steady revenue stream so that they could offer better public services, distributing tax income that would otherwise have stayed with the central government.

Jia Kang, a senior economist at a think tank under the Ministry of Finance, told the forum that the tax would serve to stabilise prices, as some buyers would be put off expensive homes given the extra tax they would incur, forcing developers to build more modest apartments.

Average property prices across 70 large and medium-sized cities rose 10.7 per cent from a year earlier in March, slowing from February’s 10.9 per cent pace.

‘The reform will help with the development of a healthy property market in China and fairer distribution of the national wealth,’ said Mr Zhou.

Still, the final launch of such a tax structure will probably not come any time soon, some officials say. ‘It’s unlikely that China will launch the new tax within five years,’ said a tax official in the eastern province of Jiangsu. His province is one of 10 regions that have started to simulate the introduction of the tax on a pilot basis.

The tax administration said in January that it would expand the simulation exercise to three to five more provinces and municipalities this year.

‘The property tax reform is a gradual process,’ Mr Zhou said. ‘We need to address all the problems by expanding and deepening our trial programme.’

An official at the Beijing tax bureau, told Reuters that residential properties would be exempted at first and said authorities had yet to decide on a tax rate.

Mr Long added that even when China started to tax residential buildings, it would need to exclude certain low-income families. – Reuters

Source : Business Times – 23 Apr 2008

Posted in General, Overseas Property | Tagged: , , | Leave a Comment »

JTC to sell $1.7b of properties

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

Volatile capital markets cited as main reason

JTC Corp has scrapped plans to divest a large chunk of its industrial property portfolio through a listed real estate investment trust (Reit).

Instead, it will sell the 62 properties for $1.71 billion to Temasek-linked Mapletree Investments, which it had earlier appointed to manage the planned trust. This is because of recent weak stock market conditions.

“Since the appointment of Mapletree as the Reitmanager in February, the global and local capital markets have continued to remain volatile,” explained Ms Ow Foong Pheng, JTC’s chief executive.

Mapletree may still proceed with listing the properties as a REIT at a later date.

Singapore’s 20 existing listed Reits have fallen on average by 11 per cent this year amid concerns that the credit crisis in the United States might spread and hurt their ability to finance shortterm debt.

JTC’s decision to divest followed Mr Raymond Lim’s “Yellow Pages rule” in 2005, while championing entrepreneurship under the Ministry of Trade and Industry.

Besides cutting red tape, Mr Lim then said government agencies should not be in any business where the private sector is already performing and can be found in the Yellow Pages.

This was to help provide space for private businesses to bloom.

JTC heavily dominates Singapore’s industrial property landscape.

Mapletree may be independently managed but it still has government links as it is part of the Temasek family.

Mr Hiew Yoon Khong, Mapletree’s chief executive, said: “Mapletree will explore the possibility of listing the portfolio as a Reit, possibly in combination with other Mapletree industrial assets in due course.

“Meanwhile, our immediate focus will be to ensure a smooth transition for tenants and we look forward to working closely with them in the near future.”

Mapletree has an asset base of around $4.4 billion, comprising office, logistics, industrial, retail and lifestyle properties. It also manages another $3 billion worth of properties across Asia.

In this sale, Mapletree will get 39 blocks of flatted factories, 12 amenity centres, six stack-up buildings, one rampup building, one warehouse, and three multi-tenanted business parks. They are the Synergy and Strategy at the International Business Park and Signature at the Changi Business Park.

JTC said it may still divest other industrial properties through trade sales.

Source: Today – 23 Apr 2008

Posted in General, REITS | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Six months, still no F&N CEO

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

Is it a question of finding the right person or deciding on a new direction first?

IT HAS been more than six months since local food and beverage giant, Fraser and Neave (F&N) has been without a full-time chief executive officer following the hasty departure of Dr Han Cheng Fong last October.

Mr Lee Hsien Yang assumed the post of chairman in the middle of that same month and has since had to take on the CEO’s responsibilities at the same time. But he is on record as saying: “I have no desire to stay on as acting CEO or executive chairman for long.”

He also said that the company would be announcing a new CEO in “due course”. That was said at the company’s annual general meeting of shareholders in January.

It’s now coming to the end of April and there still is no CEO at F&N. F&N is not only the largest producer of soft drinks in Singapore, but the company is also into brewing beer, developing property, running serviced apartments and, under Times Publishing, printing and publishing.

Before that AGM, I had reported that the company had temporarily suspended its search for a CEO pending a review of its business units. The review was to determine whether the company was going to hive off its three main business units — food and beverage, property and printing and publishing — into separate companies or retain the status quo and keep the three businesses in one company.

This was vehemently denied by F&N group company secretary Anthony Cheong: “It has not been put on hold and is not ‘pending a review of the group’s future direction’.

However, the company was reported to have said that it was not in a hurry as it wanted to find the right person for the job.

But would it make sense to hire somebody to run F&N as it is now, only for him to see the company broken into separate units later on? Wouldn’t it be better to a make a decision now on the company’s direction and then decide on the appropriate person?

It was reportedly a finding by Dr Han, 65, that group morale would be adversely impacted should F&N be broken up that led to differences with then chairman Michael Fam and the former’s eventual departure from the company.

Many analysts believe that the sum of parts — that is if the group is broken up into separate business units and listed separately — would bring greater benefits to F&N’s shareholders.

It was only six years ago that F&N privatised Centrepoint Properties and Times Publishing and absorbed them into the main company. At that time, the rationale was: “The privatisation of Centrepoint and TimesPub is aimed at restructuring F&N into a stronger and more flexible group, to further enhance shareholder value and sustain long-term growth … F&N, as an entrepreneurial shareholder in these companies, already plays a proactive and pivotal role in charting the strategic directions of these businesses. The privatisation of Centrepoint and TimesPub will give more flexibility in managing their resources.”

Dr Fam also went on to add that “through appropriate rationalisation and consolidation measures, we hope to realise greater synergies within the group — for instance, by sharing best practices and tapping on the combined wealth of experience, knowledge and expertise of the management teams”.

While F&N should ensure that it finds the right person for the job, keeping its shareholders guessing for too long on where it’s going is also not fair to them.

Mr Lee is more than capable of running the company well, but his declaration that he does not want to be CEO or executive chairman for long might give the impression, rightly or wrongly, to shareholders that he is just doing a maintenance job.

Source : Today – 23 Apr 2008

Posted in General | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

MAS stresses it will not regulate Islamic banking sector in S’pore

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

The central bank has reiterated its stance that it will not regulate the Islamic banking market here in Singapore.

At a conference on Islamic Finance on Tuesday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) instead argued that Shariah-compliance should be regulated internally as part of a bank’s good practice in governance and control.

The Islamic banking market is estimated to be worth as much as US$800 billion worldwide and it is growing by up to 30 per cent in some markets.

While there has been a push for Singapore to have a greater pie of the market, the MAS said regulation may be counter-productive in small markets.

Chia Der Jiun, Executive Director, Prudential Policy, MAS, said: “Much of the business is going to be wholesale, off-shore, international counter parties, and these counter parties may reside in the Gulf, in Southeast Asia, and they have Shariah interpretations and standards that may be somewhat unique in their jurisdictions.”

The response came amid talk that regulation may be needed to help boost investor confidence. Some industry players said this will help attract more Islamic private wealth from overseas and further increase Singapore’s status as a wealth management hub.

Aimi Zulhazmi, Principal Officer, BIMB Trust, said: “People are looking at Singapore as a leading player in the financial market. A lot of wealth especially on the private wealth management resides in Singapore.”

While the MAS said there is no need for a separate Islamic banking regulatory framework, it noted that more disclosures are needed as they would help investors make better investment choices. – CNA/vm

Source : Channel NewsAsia -22 Apr 2008

Posted in Finance, General | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

MAS stresses it will not regulate Islamic banking sector in S’pore

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

The central bank has reiterated its stance that it will not regulate the Islamic banking market here in Singapore.

At a conference on Islamic Finance on Tuesday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) instead argued that Shariah-compliance should be regulated internally as part of a bank’s good practice in governance and control.

The Islamic banking market is estimated to be worth as much as US$800 billion worldwide and it is growing by up to 30 per cent in some markets.

While there has been a push for Singapore to have a greater pie of the market, the MAS said regulation may be counter-productive in small markets.

Chia Der Jiun, Executive Director, Prudential Policy, MAS, said: “Much of the business is going to be wholesale, off-shore, international counter parties, and these counter parties may reside in the Gulf, in Southeast Asia, and they have Shariah interpretations and standards that may be somewhat unique in their jurisdictions.”

The response came amid talk that regulation may be needed to help boost investor confidence. Some industry players said this will help attract more Islamic private wealth from overseas and further increase Singapore’s status as a wealth management hub.

Aimi Zulhazmi, Principal Officer, BIMB Trust, said: “People are looking at Singapore as a leading player in the financial market. A lot of wealth especially on the private wealth management resides in Singapore.”

While the MAS said there is no need for a separate Islamic banking regulatory framework, it noted that more disclosures are needed as they would help investors make better investment choices. – CNA/vm

Source : Channel NewsAsia -22 Apr 2008

Posted in Finance, General | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

MAS stresses it will not regulate Islamic banking sector in S’pore

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

The central bank has reiterated its stance that it will not regulate the Islamic banking market here in Singapore.

At a conference on Islamic Finance on Tuesday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) instead argued that Shariah-compliance should be regulated internally as part of a bank’s good practice in governance and control.

The Islamic banking market is estimated to be worth as much as US$800 billion worldwide and it is growing by up to 30 per cent in some markets.

While there has been a push for Singapore to have a greater pie of the market, the MAS said regulation may be counter-productive in small markets.

Chia Der Jiun, Executive Director, Prudential Policy, MAS, said: “Much of the business is going to be wholesale, off-shore, international counter parties, and these counter parties may reside in the Gulf, in Southeast Asia, and they have Shariah interpretations and standards that may be somewhat unique in their jurisdictions.”

The response came amid talk that regulation may be needed to help boost investor confidence. Some industry players said this will help attract more Islamic private wealth from overseas and further increase Singapore’s status as a wealth management hub.

Aimi Zulhazmi, Principal Officer, BIMB Trust, said: “People are looking at Singapore as a leading player in the financial market. A lot of wealth especially on the private wealth management resides in Singapore.”

While the MAS said there is no need for a separate Islamic banking regulatory framework, it noted that more disclosures are needed as they would help investors make better investment choices. – CNA/vm

Source : Channel NewsAsia -22 Apr 2008

Posted in Finance, General | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

MAS stresses it will not regulate Islamic banking sector in S’pore

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

The central bank has reiterated its stance that it will not regulate the Islamic banking market here in Singapore.

At a conference on Islamic Finance on Tuesday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) instead argued that Shariah-compliance should be regulated internally as part of a bank’s good practice in governance and control.

The Islamic banking market is estimated to be worth as much as US$800 billion worldwide and it is growing by up to 30 per cent in some markets.

While there has been a push for Singapore to have a greater pie of the market, the MAS said regulation may be counter-productive in small markets.

Chia Der Jiun, Executive Director, Prudential Policy, MAS, said: “Much of the business is going to be wholesale, off-shore, international counter parties, and these counter parties may reside in the Gulf, in Southeast Asia, and they have Shariah interpretations and standards that may be somewhat unique in their jurisdictions.”

The response came amid talk that regulation may be needed to help boost investor confidence. Some industry players said this will help attract more Islamic private wealth from overseas and further increase Singapore’s status as a wealth management hub.

Aimi Zulhazmi, Principal Officer, BIMB Trust, said: “People are looking at Singapore as a leading player in the financial market. A lot of wealth especially on the private wealth management resides in Singapore.”

While the MAS said there is no need for a separate Islamic banking regulatory framework, it noted that more disclosures are needed as they would help investors make better investment choices. – CNA/vm

Source : Channel NewsAsia -22 Apr 2008

Posted in Finance, General | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

MAS stresses it will not regulate Islamic banking sector in S’pore

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

The central bank has reiterated its stance that it will not regulate the Islamic banking market here in Singapore.

At a conference on Islamic Finance on Tuesday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) instead argued that Shariah-compliance should be regulated internally as part of a bank’s good practice in governance and control.

The Islamic banking market is estimated to be worth as much as US$800 billion worldwide and it is growing by up to 30 per cent in some markets.

While there has been a push for Singapore to have a greater pie of the market, the MAS said regulation may be counter-productive in small markets.

Chia Der Jiun, Executive Director, Prudential Policy, MAS, said: “Much of the business is going to be wholesale, off-shore, international counter parties, and these counter parties may reside in the Gulf, in Southeast Asia, and they have Shariah interpretations and standards that may be somewhat unique in their jurisdictions.”

The response came amid talk that regulation may be needed to help boost investor confidence. Some industry players said this will help attract more Islamic private wealth from overseas and further increase Singapore’s status as a wealth management hub.

Aimi Zulhazmi, Principal Officer, BIMB Trust, said: “People are looking at Singapore as a leading player in the financial market. A lot of wealth especially on the private wealth management resides in Singapore.”

While the MAS said there is no need for a separate Islamic banking regulatory framework, it noted that more disclosures are needed as they would help investors make better investment choices. – CNA/vm

Source : Channel NewsAsia -22 Apr 2008

Posted in Finance, General | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

MAS stresses it will not regulate Islamic banking sector in S’pore

Posted by luxuryasiahome on April 23, 2008

The central bank has reiterated its stance that it will not regulate the Islamic banking market here in Singapore.

At a conference on Islamic Finance on Tuesday, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) instead argued that Shariah-compliance should be regulated internally as part of a bank’s good practice in governance and control.

The Islamic banking market is estimated to be worth as much as US$800 billion worldwide and it is growing by up to 30 per cent in some markets.

While there has been a push for Singapore to have a greater pie of the market, the MAS said regulation may be counter-productive in small markets.

Chia Der Jiun, Executive Director, Prudential Policy, MAS, said: “Much of the business is going to be wholesale, off-shore, international counter parties, and these counter parties may reside in the Gulf, in Southeast Asia, and they have Shariah interpretations and standards that may be somewhat unique in their jurisdictions.”

The response came amid talk that regulation may be needed to help boost investor confidence. Some industry players said this will help attract more Islamic private wealth from overseas and further increase Singapore’s status as a wealth management hub.

Aimi Zulhazmi, Principal Officer, BIMB Trust, said: “People are looking at Singapore as a leading player in the financial market. A lot of wealth especially on the private wealth management resides in Singapore.”

While the MAS said there is no need for a separate Islamic banking regulatory framework, it noted that more disclosures are needed as they would help investors make better investment choices. – CNA/vm

Source : Channel NewsAsia -22 Apr 2008

Posted in Finance, General | Tagged: , , , , , | Leave a Comment »